U.S. Postal Service says new mail-in voting restrictions are now in effect
ELECTIONS

U.S. Postal Service says new mail-in voting restrictions are now in effect

Aug 27, 2026Updated 5:41pm ET

The U.S. Postal Service says new rules for handling mail-in ballots tied to President Donald Trump’s executive order are now in effect after the Supreme Court lifted a lower-court block, prompting a multi-state lawsuit to stop the changes before November.

The U.S. Postal Service says new rules for handling mail-in ballots tied to President Donald Trump’s executive order are now in effect after the Supreme Court lifted a lower-court block, prompting a multi-state lawsuit to stop the changes before November.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
ApnewsThe GuardianAtlanta Journal-ConstitutionAl JazeeraBluewinLos Angeles Times

Confirmed by 9+ sources.

What This is

  • The Supreme Court lifted a lower-court injunction, allowing parts of President Donald Trump’s executive order on mail voting to move forward while lawsuits continue.
  • The U.S. Postal Service says the new ballot-handling requirements tied to the order are now in effect and were implemented immediately ahead of the November midterms.
  • One change would require state election officials to submit voter data through a USPS system for inspection, which states argue forces them to share sensitive election information with a federal agency.
  • The rules and order would limit sending or delivering mail ballot materials based on eligibility checks, including using federal records and a list of eligible voters tied to DHS.
  • Another change would require stricter ballot-envelope design standards, including unique tracking barcodes, to meet USPS requirements.
  • Pennsylvania’s governor, Washington, Washington, D.C., and more than 20 other states filed a new federal lawsuit seeking to block the USPS rules and the executive order’s mail-voting provisions.

Why This Matters

  • Mail voting depends on clear, stable rules; last-minute changes can confuse voters and election offices.
  • The fight tests how much control the federal government can claim over election administration that states usually run.
  • If eligibility checks are wrong or handled unevenly, eligible voters could lose a ballot or have it delayed.
  • Tracking and envelope standards could improve security and troubleshooting, but they may also raise costs and create new failure points if states cannot comply in time.

Who else would want to know this?