Twenty-five states sue FEMA and DHS over alleged withholding of federal funds
GOVERNANCE INSTITUTIONS

Twenty-five states sue FEMA and DHS over alleged withholding of federal funds

Jul 24, 2026Updated 7:15am ET

A coalition of 25 states and Washington, D.C., sued FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security, saying the Trump administration is unlawfully conditioning disaster and homeland-security grants on state election changes and cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

A coalition of 25 states and Washington, D.C., sued FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security, saying the Trump administration is unlawfully conditioning disaster and homeland-security grants on state election changes and cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
ABC News MediaThe Boston GlobeBoston HeraldCBS NewsCSClickOnDetroit

Confirmed by 14+ sources.

What This is

  • Twenty-five states and Washington, D.C., filed a federal lawsuit against FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security over new conditions tied to grant funding.
  • The suit targets conditions tied to billions in disaster-preparedness, emergency-management, and homeland-security grants administered by DHS and FEMA.
  • The states say DHS has withheld, or threatened to withhold, hundreds of millions in Homeland Security grant funding under the new conditions.
  • The states say FEMA and DHS are using disaster-preparedness and homeland-security grants to pressure states to adopt the administration’s preferred election and immigration policies.
  • The challenged election-related conditions include voter citizenship checks, paper or hand-marked ballots, and required manual audits and reconciliations of votes.
  • The states also challenge conditions that would require more cooperation with federal immigration enforcement to receive or keep the funds.
  • The states say DHS has threatened to withhold, cut, or cancel grants if states do not meet the new requirements.
  • The states argue the policy violates federal administrative law and the Constitution’s limits on how Congress and agencies can set conditions on federal spending.
  • The Trump administration says the election-related requirements are meant to protect election integrity.

Why This Matters

  • It shapes how much Washington can pressure states by attaching policy demands to disaster and security money.
  • It affects how far federal agencies can go without clear instructions from Congress.
  • It could change how elections are run in many states if funding is on the line.
  • It could influence state and local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, including during emergencies.

Who else would want to know this?