Trump threatens to reinstate $1.8 billion fund amid Blanche confirmation dispute
GOVERNANCE INSTITUTIONS

Trump threatens to reinstate $1.8 billion fund amid Blanche confirmation dispute

Aug 2, 2026Updated 7:54am ET

President Trump is threatening to revive a proposed $1.8 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” and keep Todd Blanche as acting attorney general as two Republican senators stall Blanche’s confirmation over demands for written limits on the fund and a Trump-IRS settlement’s audit protections.

President Trump is threatening to revive a proposed $1.8 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” and keep Todd Blanche as acting attorney general as two Republican senators stall Blanche’s confirmation over demands for written limits on the fund and a Trump-IRS settlement’s audit protections.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
NPRThe GuardianPOLITICOCNNABC 15ABC 30

Confirmed by 57+ sources.

What This is

  • Todd Blanche, Trump’s acting attorney general and former personal lawyer, is awaiting a Senate Judiciary Committee vote to advance his nomination.
  • Republican senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis are withholding support and say they could block Blanche unless the Justice Department gives firm commitments in writing.
  • The standoff centers on a proposed $1.8 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” that grew out of a settlement tied to Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS.
  • Cornyn and Tillis want the fund formally ended on paper and want the settlement language narrowed so any protection from IRS audits is limited.
  • Trump has sent mixed messages, at times calling the fund “dead” but also threatening to push Congress to enact it if Blanche is not confirmed.
  • Trump has also warned he could keep Blanche in the acting job, and has floated temporarily withdrawing and later resubmitting the nomination to get around Senate holdouts.
  • A federal judge has voided or blocked the underlying IRS settlement and criticized the case as improper, and Trump has appealed the ruling.

Why This Matters

  • The fight shapes how much independence the attorney general has from presidential pressure.
  • It tests how much leverage a few senators have over major appointments inside their own party.
  • A large compensation fund controlled by the executive branch raises basic questions about fairness and who should get public money.
  • Disputes over IRS audit protections affect public trust that tax rules apply equally to powerful people.
  • If an acting attorney general can stay in place for long periods, the Senate’s role in confirming top officials can be weakened in practice.

Who else would want to know this?