Trump offers a rare dual endorsement in GOP runoff in South Carolina
POLITICS

Trump offers a rare dual endorsement in GOP runoff in South Carolina

Jun 20, 2026Updated 6:15am ET

Donald Trump issued a rare dual endorsement in South Carolina’s June 23 Republican gubernatorial runoff, backing both Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette and Attorney General Alan Wilson.

Donald Trump issued a rare dual endorsement in South Carolina’s June 23 Republican gubernatorial runoff, backing both Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette and Attorney General Alan Wilson.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
CNNClickOnDetroitWKMGThe IndependentKGWKSAT

Confirmed by 20+ sources.

What This is

  • Donald Trump issued a rare dual endorsement in South Carolina’s June 23 Republican gubernatorial runoff, backing both Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette and Attorney General Alan Wilson.
  • Trump had previously endorsed Evette ahead of the June 9 primary, then shifted to saying voters “can’t go wrong” with either candidate.
  • Evette finished first in the June 9 primary but did not win a majority, forcing a runoff against Wilson.
  • Trump described both candidates as aligned with “MAGA” and “America First,” and said he did not want to hurt one by choosing the other.
  • The dual endorsement came after recent primary setbacks for some Trump-backed candidates and is seen as a way to reduce the risk of backing a loser.
  • Wilson has also picked up endorsements from other prominent Republicans, including Sen. Tim Scott, Sen. Ted Cruz, and Rep. Ralph Norman.
  • Evette and Wilson’s runoff has turned into a heated intraparty contest, including public disputes tied to Cruz’s endorsement and campaign messaging.
  • In their final debate before the runoff, Evette and Wilson traded attacks and argued over issues like state income-tax cuts, casino gambling, medical marijuana, and other record-based disputes.

Why This Matters

  • It tests how much a Trump endorsement still influences Republican primary voters when local candidate networks and state issues matter most.
  • A dual endorsement blurs accountability, making it harder for voters and party actors to judge whether endorsements are leadership signals or brand protection.
  • The outcome shapes South Carolina’s policy direction and governing style in a conservative state where the Republican nominee is likely favored in the general election.
  • Competing endorsements from figures like Tim Scott and Ted Cruz highlight internal party coalitions that can affect national fundraising, alliances, and future presidential positioning.

Who else would want to know this?