Trump criticizes former lawyer Alina Habba Mildon over new contract with pardoned Venezuelan family
GOVERNANCE INSTITUTIONS

Trump criticizes former lawyer Alina Habba Mildon over new contract with pardoned Venezuelan family

Nov 1, 2026Updated 7:43am ET

Donald Trump criticized a reported $50 million contract his former lawyer Alina Habba Mildon signed with a firm tied to Venezuelan banker Julio Herrera Velutini’s family, after Herrera later received a presidential pardon and questions arose about whether the deal sought clemency.

Donald Trump criticized a reported $50 million contract his former lawyer Alina Habba Mildon signed with a firm tied to Venezuelan banker Julio Herrera Velutini’s family, after Herrera later received a presidential pardon and questions arose about whether the deal sought clemency.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh

Confirmed by 10+ sources.

What This is

  • Donald Trump criticized a reported $50 million contract involving his former lawyer Alina Habba Mildon, calling it unacceptable and outrageous.
  • The deal was reported to pay about $10 million a year for four years, with possible bonuses, in a role connected to a company tied to Herrera Velutini’s family.
  • Several accounts say Trump told aides Habba should donate some of the money to his future presidential library or another Trump-linked entity.
  • The contract was signed while Habba held Justice Department-connected roles, raising questions about outside work while tied to the department.
  • Julio Herrera Velutini, a Venezuelan banker, later received an unconditional presidential pardon from Trump after pleading guilty to an illegal campaign finance-related offense.
  • Habba Mildon and White House and Justice Department officials denied any improper link between her contract and the pardon.
  • Habba Mildon said she was not paid for a pardon and was not involved in pardon discussions, disputing claims that the contract was for securing clemency.

Why This Matters

  • The dispute raises trust questions about whether presidential pardons are based on justice or on who can pay for access and influence.
  • It highlights how outside work by people tied to the Justice Department can create conflicts of interest, or the appearance of them.
  • It adds pressure for clearer rules and disclosure on pardon lobbying, big donations, and fundraising for presidential projects like libraries.

Who else would want to know this?