IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT
Trump administration rejects Mamdani's call to halt ICE operations after NYC shooting
After ICE agents shot and wounded Oscar Belgal during an attempted arrest in New York City, Mayor Zohran Mamdani urged the Trump administration to halt ICE operations in the city, and Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin rejected the request.
After ICE agents shot and wounded Oscar Belgal during an attempted arrest in New York City, Mayor Zohran Mamdani urged the Trump administration to halt ICE operations in the city, and Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin rejected the request.
Corroboration
LowMedHigh
Confirmed by 45+ sources.
What This is
- An ICE officer shot and wounded 28-year-old Oscar Belgal during an attempted arrest in the Marble Hill area of New York City, and Belgal survived and was hospitalized.
- Officials said Belgal’s 5-year-old child was in the car during the encounter and was not physically injured.
- New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani condemned the shooting and called on President Donald Trump and DHS to halt ICE enforcement operations in the city, also urging that Belgal be released to city custody.
- Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin rejected calls to pause ICE operations in New York, saying the agency will keep enforcing immigration laws and targeting serious offenders.
- The shooting triggered protests at the scene and outside the hospital, and some protests clashed with the New York Police Department.
- The NYPD released body-camera footage showing officers responding after the shooting and taking Belgal for medical care, while investigations involved federal authorities including Homeland Security Investigations and, in some reports, the FBI.
- A federal judge temporarily blocked Belgal’s immediate deportation while his legal challenge to detention is pending.
Why This Matters
- The clash shows the limits of city power when federal agents operate locally.
- It puts a spotlight on when officers should shoot during arrests, especially around children.
- It deepens the fight over “sanctuary” policies and whether they protect residents or block removals.
- Disputes over masked or plainclothes operations can shape public trust and accountability.
- The court order shows how quickly a use-of-force case can turn into a deportation and detention battle.





