Trump administration alleges Berkeley Law favors Black applicants in admissions
EDUCATION

Trump administration alleges Berkeley Law favors Black applicants in admissions

Sep 11, 2026Updated 7:43am ET

The U.S. Justice Department and Education Department say a compliance review found UC Berkeley School of Law illegally used race in admissions for the 2024 and 2025 classes, while the school denies it and federal officials are seeking a settlement.

The U.S. Justice Department and Education Department say a compliance review found UC Berkeley School of Law illegally used race in admissions for the 2024 and 2025 classes, while the school denies it and federal officials are seeking a settlement.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
The New York TimesReutersApnewsThe IndependentKRON4Los Angeles Times

Confirmed by 11+ sources.

What This is

  • Federal officials from the Justice and Education Departments announced a joint investigation into UC Berkeley School of Law’s admissions practices.
  • The administration alleges the law school intentionally favored Black applicants and discriminated against white and Asian applicants in admissions.
  • Federal officials say the admissions practices violate Title VI, the civil rights law that bars race discrimination by schools that receive federal funds.
  • Federal officials cited an analysis claiming Black applicants had 5.8 times greater odds of admission than comparable white applicants.
  • The Justice Department also pointed to differences in LSAT score patterns between admitted students of different races as part of its evidence.
  • Federal officials pointed to essay prompts about diversity and related admissions practices as evidence that race influenced decisions.
  • The Justice Department said it wants a voluntary settlement and will sue if no agreement is reached.

Why This Matters

  • It will help define what admissions offices can do to pursue diversity without using race as a factor.
  • It shows how federal investigations and settlement demands can force policy changes without a court ruling.
  • It could reshape how selective schools use “diversity” essays that may reveal an applicant’s race.
  • It adds fuel to a national debate over fairness for different racial groups in elite admissions.

Who else would want to know this?