Teleprompter operator suspended over Kalshi bets allegations, White House says
INSIDER TRADING

Teleprompter operator suspended over Kalshi bets allegations, White House says

Jul 18, 2026Updated 8:17am ET

The White House put a longtime teleprompter operator, Gabriel Perez, on unpaid administrative leave over allegations he bet on what President Trump would say in speeches.

The White House put a longtime teleprompter operator, Gabriel Perez, on unpaid administrative leave over allegations he bet on what President Trump would say in speeches.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
NPRThe GuardianCNNABC 15ABC 30abc7

Confirmed by 46+ sources.

What This is

  • The White House put a longtime teleprompter operator, Gabriel Perez, on unpaid administrative leave over allegations he bet on what President Trump would say in speeches.
  • The allegations center on Perez using advance access to Trump’s prepared remarks to make better-timed bets before speeches.
  • The alleged bets were placed on Kalshi “mention markets,” which let users wager on whether certain words, phrases, or topics will appear in a public speech.
  • Reports say the trading produced roughly $90,000 to over $100,000 in profits, much of which was frozen or held back by Kalshi.
  • Kalshi says its monitoring flagged unusually patterned trading tied to an account associated with Perez and froze the account after the activity was detected.
  • Kalshi referred the matter to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the CFTC is investigating, with some reports describing possible insider-trading-type concerns.
  • The White House said the conduct violated strict ethics rules, and it switched to a different teleprompter operator for at least one major address.
  • Several reports say Perez is in talks to settle with regulators, which could include returning profits and agreeing not to make similar trades.

Why This Matters

  • If government staff can profit from early access to speeches, it weakens trust in basic public-service ethics.
  • It highlights a fairness problem in prediction markets when one side may know the outcome before everyone else.
  • The outcome could influence what kinds of “bet on real-world events” products platforms can offer and what checks they must build in.
  • The case also raises a moral question about turning inside political work into private gain.

Who else would want to know this?