INSIDER TRADING
Teleprompter operator suspended over Kalshi bets allegations, White House says
The White House put a longtime teleprompter operator, Gabriel Perez, on unpaid administrative leave over allegations he bet on what President Trump would say in speeches.
The White House put a longtime teleprompter operator, Gabriel Perez, on unpaid administrative leave over allegations he bet on what President Trump would say in speeches.
Corroboration
LowMedHigh
Confirmed by 46+ sources.
What This is
- The White House put a longtime teleprompter operator, Gabriel Perez, on unpaid administrative leave over allegations he bet on what President Trump would say in speeches.
- The allegations center on Perez using advance access to Trump’s prepared remarks to make better-timed bets before speeches.
- The alleged bets were placed on Kalshi “mention markets,” which let users wager on whether certain words, phrases, or topics will appear in a public speech.
- Reports say the trading produced roughly $90,000 to over $100,000 in profits, much of which was frozen or held back by Kalshi.
- Kalshi says its monitoring flagged unusually patterned trading tied to an account associated with Perez and froze the account after the activity was detected.
- Kalshi referred the matter to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the CFTC is investigating, with some reports describing possible insider-trading-type concerns.
- The White House said the conduct violated strict ethics rules, and it switched to a different teleprompter operator for at least one major address.
- Several reports say Perez is in talks to settle with regulators, which could include returning profits and agreeing not to make similar trades.
Why This Matters
- If government staff can profit from early access to speeches, it weakens trust in basic public-service ethics.
- It highlights a fairness problem in prediction markets when one side may know the outcome before everyone else.
- The outcome could influence what kinds of “bet on real-world events” products platforms can offer and what checks they must build in.
- The case also raises a moral question about turning inside political work into private gain.





