
POLITICS
Senate confirms Todd Blanche as U.S. attorney general after narrow vote
The U.S. Senate confirmed Todd Blanche, President Donald Trump’s former personal lawyer and acting attorney general, as attorney general in a 50-49 vote after he agreed to scrap a proposed $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund and narrow parts of a Trump-IRS settlement.
The U.S. Senate confirmed Todd Blanche, President Donald Trump’s former personal lawyer and acting attorney general, as attorney general in a 50-49 vote after he agreed to scrap a proposed $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund and narrow parts of a Trump-IRS settlement.
Corroboration
LowMedHigh
Confirmed by 70+ sources.
What This is
- The Senate confirmed Todd Blanche as U.S. attorney general in a 50-49 vote after a contentious confirmation fight.
- Blanche had been serving as acting attorney general since April before the Senate vote.
- Two Republicans, Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, joined Democrats in opposing Blanche, making the outcome extremely close.
- Sen. Bill Cassidy cast the deciding vote in favor of Blanche.
- Blanche is a former personal lawyer to Trump, which fueled debate over whether he would keep the Justice Department independent from the White House.
- A major flashpoint was a proposed $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund linked to a Trump lawsuit settlement, which critics said could pay people connected to January 6 cases.
- To win key Republican support, Blanche agreed in writing to rescind the fund and to limit tax-audit protections tied to the settlement.
- Opponents also pointed to the Justice Department’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein-related records as a reason to vote no.
Why This Matters
- The attorney general shapes how federal criminal law is enforced, so doubts about independence can affect trust in the justice system.
- The fight shows how a few senators in a closely divided Senate can determine who runs major agencies.
- How the government handles Epstein-related records is becoming a broader test of transparency versus privacy and legal limits.
- The episode reflects the growing clash over whether the Justice Department is being used to reward allies or punish opponents.





