Senate confirms Todd Blanche as U.S. attorney general after narrow vote
POLITICS

Senate confirms Todd Blanche as U.S. attorney general after narrow vote

Aug 8, 2026Updated 7:03pm ET

The U.S. Senate confirmed Todd Blanche, President Donald Trump’s former personal lawyer and acting attorney general, as attorney general in a 50-49 vote after he agreed to scrap a proposed $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund and narrow parts of a Trump-IRS settlement.

The U.S. Senate confirmed Todd Blanche, President Donald Trump’s former personal lawyer and acting attorney general, as attorney general in a 50-49 vote after he agreed to scrap a proposed $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund and narrow parts of a Trump-IRS settlement.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
The New York TimesThe GuardianPOLITICOCNNABCABC 15

Confirmed by 70+ sources.

What This is

  • The Senate confirmed Todd Blanche as U.S. attorney general in a 50-49 vote after a contentious confirmation fight.
  • Blanche had been serving as acting attorney general since April before the Senate vote.
  • Two Republicans, Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, joined Democrats in opposing Blanche, making the outcome extremely close.
  • Sen. Bill Cassidy cast the deciding vote in favor of Blanche.
  • Blanche is a former personal lawyer to Trump, which fueled debate over whether he would keep the Justice Department independent from the White House.
  • A major flashpoint was a proposed $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund linked to a Trump lawsuit settlement, which critics said could pay people connected to January 6 cases.
  • To win key Republican support, Blanche agreed in writing to rescind the fund and to limit tax-audit protections tied to the settlement.
  • Opponents also pointed to the Justice Department’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein-related records as a reason to vote no.

Why This Matters

  • The attorney general shapes how federal criminal law is enforced, so doubts about independence can affect trust in the justice system.
  • The fight shows how a few senators in a closely divided Senate can determine who runs major agencies.
  • How the government handles Epstein-related records is becoming a broader test of transparency versus privacy and legal limits.
  • The episode reflects the growing clash over whether the Justice Department is being used to reward allies or punish opponents.

Who else would want to know this?