Sen. Tillis withholds Blanche vote until AG nominee meets Epstein survivors
EPSTEIN FILES

Sen. Tillis withholds Blanche vote until AG nominee meets Epstein survivors

Jul 16, 2026Updated 7:13pm ET

Sen. Thom Tillis says he will withhold his Senate Judiciary Committee vote on Todd Blanche unless Blanche meets with Epstein survivors before the committee vote.

Sen. Thom Tillis says he will withhold his Senate Judiciary Committee vote on Todd Blanche unless Blanche meets with Epstein survivors before the committee vote.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
The New York TimesNPRPOLITICOCNNSalt Lake CityAxios

Confirmed by 38+ sources.

What This is

  • Sen. Thom Tillis says he will withhold his Senate Judiciary Committee vote on Todd Blanche unless Blanche meets with Epstein survivors before the committee vote.
  • Because Republicans have a very narrow edge on the committee, one Republican voting no or not voting could keep Blanche’s nomination from advancing to the full Senate.
  • Blanche faced tough questioning about the Justice Department’s release of Epstein-related records after survivors said the release exposed victims’ identifying information and other sensitive material.
  • Blanche has defended the department’s review and release process, apologized for a small share of redaction mistakes, and said the Justice Department fixed problems after being alerted.
  • At the hearing, survivors testified and attended in person, urging Blanche to meet them and arguing he should be held accountable for what they say happened in the file release.
  • After Tillis’s ultimatum, the Justice Department said Blanche would meet with Epstein survivors, including reports of the meeting being arranged at DOJ headquarters or on Capitol Hill.

Why This Matters

  • It sets a clear test of whether the Justice Department treats crime victims as people with rights and dignity, not as a public-relations problem.
  • It highlights the risk that “transparency” efforts can retraumatize victims if agencies release records without strong safeguards for privacy and safety.
  • It shows how one senator can shape major nominations when party control is tight, giving individual lawmakers leverage over the attorney general choice.
  • It affects public trust in the Justice Department’s independence, since the nominee is also tied to disputes about internal politics and sensitive investigations.

Who else would want to know this?