Sen. Schmitt’s Jack Smith Perjury Claim Unravels After Basketball Mix-Up
POLITICS

Sen. Schmitt’s Jack Smith Perjury Claim Unravels After Basketball Mix-Up

Oct 1, 2026Updated 8:32am ET

Sen. Eric Schmitt accused former special counsel Jack Smith of perjury at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, claiming text messages put Smith at an Atlanta Hawks game, but Smith said the messages referred to an Iowa Hawkeyes game in Maryland, where footage later showed him in attendance.

Sen. Eric Schmitt accused former special counsel Jack Smith of perjury at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, claiming text messages put Smith at an Atlanta Hawks game, but Smith said the messages referred to an Iowa Hawkeyes game in Maryland, where footage later showed him in attendance.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
The GuardianPOLITICOCNNAdnBluewinThe Boston Globe

Confirmed by 18+ sources.

What This is

  • The exchange occurred during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in which former special counsel Jack Smith defended his Trump investigations against Republican allegations of political bias and abuse of authority.
  • Sen. Eric Schmitt used staff messages mentioning a basketball game to ask whether Smith had attended an Atlanta Hawks game on Feb. 3, 2024.
  • Smith denied being at the Hawks game and said he attended a University of Maryland women’s game featuring the Iowa Hawkeyes that day instead.
  • Sen. Amy Klobuchar said Schmitt had confused the Atlanta Hawks with the Iowa Hawkeyes and urged him to apologize, while video and images later showed Smith at the Maryland–Iowa game.
  • Schmitt accused Smith of perjury and called him a “total dirtbag”; after the Hawks–Hawkeyes mix-up emerged, he continued to defend his questioning and broader criticism of Smith and did not apologize.

Why This Matters

  • It shows how congressional hearings can shift from oversight to viral moments, which can distract from what lawmakers can actually prove.
  • It reflects deep partisan distrust over whether the prosecutions of Trump represented neutral law enforcement or political targeting.
  • It highlights how partisan amplification can reinforce a mistaken claim and how hard it can be to correct once it becomes a political talking point.
  • Attacks on a prosecutor’s credibility can cast doubt on both past and future investigations.

Who else would want to know this?