Report says UAE warned Netanyahu of major Hamas attack days before Oct. 7, 2023
ISRAEL PALESTINE

Report says UAE warned Netanyahu of major Hamas attack days before Oct. 7, 2023

Sep 8, 2026Updated 12:22pm ET

A Haaretz report, based on a forthcoming book, says UAE President Mohamed bin Zayed warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu days before Oct. 7, 2023 that Hamas was planning a major attack, a claim Netanyahu’s office denies.

A Haaretz report, based on a forthcoming book, says UAE President Mohamed bin Zayed warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu days before Oct. 7, 2023 that Hamas was planning a major attack, a claim Netanyahu’s office denies.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
The GuardianCNNBoston HeraldCBCClickOnDetroitBoulder Daily Camera

Confirmed by 14+ sources.

What This is

  • A Haaretz report, based on a new book, says the UAE’s leader warned Netanyahu shortly before Oct. 7 that Hamas was preparing a major operation.
  • The report says the warning came in a roughly 45-minute call about a week and a half to ten days before the attack.
  • The book-based account says the warning included claims that Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar was planning an operation that could cause major bloodshed and destabilize the region.
  • The report alleges Netanyahu did not share the warning with Israel’s senior security chiefs.
  • It also says Netanyahu downplayed alerts from Egyptian intelligence about a possible attack.
  • Netanyahu’s office has denied the report’s account.
  • The allegation has become a campaign issue, with opposition figures demanding answers and calling for an independent inquiry into the pre-Oct. 7 security failures.

Why This Matters

  • If leaders got a credible warning and did not act, it raises basic questions about responsibility after a national disaster.
  • The dispute could sway Israeli politics by shaping trust in Netanyahu and in the security agencies meant to prevent attacks.
  • It could also affect ties with Arab partners like the UAE, since intelligence sharing depends on confidence that sensitive warnings will be handled seriously and quietly.
  • More broadly, it shows the moral and practical risk of judging uncertain intelligence when the costs of being wrong are extreme.

Who else would want to know this?