Prosecutors probe George Santos' trades on Kalshi and other prediction markets
GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY

Prosecutors probe George Santos' trades on Kalshi and other prediction markets

Jun 3, 2026Updated 10:57am ET

Federal authorities are investigating whether former Rep. George Santos improperly traded on prediction markets tied to whether he would attend President Trump’s State of the Union address.

Federal authorities are investigating whether former Rep. George Santos improperly traded on prediction markets tied to whether he would attend President Trump’s State of the Union address.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
The New York TimesNPRThe GuardianABC 15ABC News MediaThe Boston Globe

Confirmed by 23+ sources.

What This is

  • Federal authorities are investigating whether former Rep. George Santos improperly traded on prediction markets tied to whether he would attend President Trump’s State of the Union address.
  • Kalshi flagged suspicious wagers after Santos publicly said he planned to attend and later did not appear, and the company referred the activity to the Justice Department and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
  • The core question is whether Santos used nonpublic knowledge about his own travel plans, or misleading public statements, to profit from bets on his attendance.
  • Multiple reports say Kalshi froze an account it says belonged to Santos as part of its response to the suspicious trading.
  • The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s enforcement staff is reviewing the trades, while the Justice Department is also probing the matter.
  • Santos has said he is unaware of any investigation and has declined to confirm details such as whether he had a Kalshi account.
  • The investigation is unfolding against a backdrop of broader scrutiny of prediction markets and questions about how they police manipulation and potential insider trading.

Why This Matters

  • The case tests how effectively prediction markets can deter and detect manipulation when a trader can influence the outcome or market belief with their own statements.
  • It probes how insider-trading concepts apply outside stock markets, clarifying what counts as unfair advantage or deception in regulated betting-style financial products.
  • The outcome could shape how aggressively federal regulators oversee fast-growing political and event-based markets, including rules for monitoring, freezing accounts, and referrals.
  • It raises public-integrity concerns about whether former officials can use personal access and public platforms to convert political visibility into private gain.

Who else would want to know this?