Officials requested phone records for journalists and relatives to identify anonymous sources
SPEECH

Officials requested phone records for journalists and relatives to identify anonymous sources

Jul 20, 2026Updated 6:56pm ET

Court filings say the Justice Department sought call and text records for several New York Times reporters and some relatives or spouses tied to stories about a Qatari-provided Air Force One.

Court filings say the Justice Department sought call and text records for several New York Times reporters and some relatives or spouses tied to stories about a Qatari-provided Air Force One.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
WSJThe GuardianCNNABC 15AdnThe Boston Globe

Confirmed by 28+ sources.

What This is

  • Court filings say the Justice Department sought call and text records for several New York Times reporters and some relatives or spouses tied to stories about a Qatari-provided Air Force One.
  • The requests were linked to a leak investigation involving reporting about alleged security shortcomings with the aircraft and related coverage that contradicted President Trump’s public account.
  • Some subpoenas were issued through a grand jury and also sought information for time periods that extended beyond the publication dates of the articles at issue, according to the Times.
  • The Times says some reporters were subpoenaed to testify before a federal grand jury, including subpoenas reportedly delivered to journalists’ homes.
  • The New York Times has filed motions to quash the subpoenas, arguing they are overbroad, chill reporting, and threaten confidential sources and First Amendment protections.

Why This Matters

  • It tests how far the government can go to identify leakers without discouraging people from talking to journalists.
  • It affects whether reporters can promise confidentiality, which often determines whether sensitive stories reach the public at all.
  • It raises the risk that investigators will pull in family members’ records, which can widen the personal cost of doing journalism.
  • It adds to the broader debate over how leak investigations should work when national security claims collide with press freedom.

Who else would want to know this?