Missouri asks Supreme Court to allow use of GOP-drawn voting map
ELECTION INTEGRITY

Missouri asks Supreme Court to allow use of GOP-drawn voting map

Sep 6, 2026Updated 5:55pm ET

Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway asked the U.S. Supreme Court to let the state use a Republican-drawn congressional map in November after the Missouri Supreme Court blocked it, saying a valid referendum petition suspended the map until voters decide.

Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway asked the U.S. Supreme Court to let the state use a Republican-drawn congressional map in November after the Missouri Supreme Court blocked it, saying a valid referendum petition suspended the map until voters decide.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
The New York TimesAl JazeeraCNBCKansas City StarSTLtodayFox News

Confirmed by 6+ sources.

What This is

  • The Missouri Supreme Court unanimously blocked the new map and ordered the state to use the prior congressional districts for now.
  • The Missouri Supreme Court ordered the referendum to be placed on the November ballot to decide whether to keep the new map.
  • Missouri’s attorney general filed an emergency request at the U.S. Supreme Court to let the state use a new Republican-drawn congressional map for the November election.
  • The disputed map would have reshaped key areas, including splitting Kansas City into three Republican-leaning districts.
  • The Missouri Supreme Court said the new map was never in effect and blamed Secretary of State Denny Hoskins for waiting until the August primary to certify enough signatures for the referendum, which the court said added confusion.
  • Because the August primary was held under the now-blocked map, the ruling left questions about the status of primary winners and possible next steps.

Why This Matters

  • Redistricting disputes can change which party has an advantage in Congress by changing who votes in each district.
  • Late changes to election maps can confuse candidates, voters, and local election offices, and raise the risk of administrative errors.
  • The case highlights how voter referendums can pause laws passed by lawmakers, and how courts decide when that pause takes effect.
  • If the U.S.
  • Supreme Court intervenes, it could influence when courts will allow election rules to change close to Election Day.

Who else would want to know this?