ELECTIONS
Kansas GOP lawmakers introduce plan to replace appointed Supreme Court justices with elections
Kansas voters are deciding whether to change how the Kansas Supreme Court is chosen by amending the state constitution.
Kansas voters are deciding whether to change how the Kansas Supreme Court is chosen by amending the state constitution.
Corroboration
LowMedHigh
Confirmed by 14+ sources.
What This is
- Kansas voters are deciding whether to change how the Kansas Supreme Court is chosen by amending the state constitution.
- The amendment would replace the current merit-based nominating commission and governor appointment process with direct elections for Supreme Court justices.
- Supporters, including many Republicans, say electing justices would make the court more accountable to voters instead of governors and insiders.
- Democratic candidates for Kansas governor have come out against the amendment, warning it could lower the quality of judges and threaten rights.
- Outside groups are spending millions on both sides, including networks linked to Charles Koch and George Soros, raising concerns about “dark money.”
Why This Matters
- Changing how justices are picked can reshape court decisions for decades on abortion, schools, and election rules.
- Judicial elections can increase the influence of big donors and outside groups, which can weaken public trust in courts.
- The vote weighs a basic tradeoff: more direct voter control versus judges being insulated from day-to-day politics.
- If Kansas switches systems, other states may try similar changes.




