Justice Department creates pathway to restore gun rights for some felons
JUSTICE PUBLIC SAFETY

Justice Department creates pathway to restore gun rights for some felons

Aug 19, 2026Updated 5:37pm ET

The Justice Department has finalized a rule creating an online, case-by-case process for some people with felony convictions—mainly nonviolent ones—to ask the federal government to restore their right to own guns, while keeping others presumptively ineligible.

The Justice Department has finalized a rule creating an online, case-by-case process for some people with felony convictions—mainly nonviolent ones—to ask the federal government to restore their right to own guns, while keeping others presumptively ineligible.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
NPRabc7ABC News MediaAdnBoston HeraldClickOnDetroit

Confirmed by 23+ sources.

What This is

  • The Justice Department finalized a rule that creates an online application process to seek restoration of federal gun rights after a felony conviction.
  • The new process relies on case-by-case reviews that weigh a person’s criminal history and the risk they may pose to public safety.
  • Officials said the rule is meant to create an administrative pathway for restoring gun rights, rather than limiting restoration mainly to people who get pardons.
  • The rule is designed to sidestep a long-standing congressional restriction that blocked the ATF from routinely processing these kinds of applications.
  • The Justice Department estimates about 330,000 people could seek restoration of gun rights under the new rule.

Why This Matters

  • It changes what a “lifetime” gun ban means for many people with old felony convictions, shifting the baseline from automatic loss to possible restoration.
  • It gives the executive branch more power to decide who can regain gun rights, and those judgments may change across administrations.
  • It spotlights a core disagreement about rehabilitation: whether completing a sentence should also mean regaining major civil rights.
  • If approvals are seen as too loose or too strict, it could affect public trust in both gun policy and the justice system.

Who else would want to know this?