James Comey asks judge to dismiss charges over Instagram 'seashells' post
SPEECH

James Comey asks judge to dismiss charges over Instagram 'seashells' post

Jul 28, 2026Updated 12:28pm ET

Former FBI Director James Comey has asked a federal judge to dismiss federal charges that his Instagram photo of seashells spelling “86 47” threatened President Donald Trump, arguing it was protected political speech and not a real threat.

Former FBI Director James Comey has asked a federal judge to dismiss federal charges that his Instagram photo of seashells spelling “86 47” threatened President Donald Trump, arguing it was protected political speech and not a real threat.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
CNNABC News MediaThe Boston GlobeBoston HeraldCBS NewsClickOnDetroit

Confirmed by 31+ sources.

What This is

  • James Comey is asking a federal judge to throw out an indictment over an Instagram photo of seashells arranged as “86 47” (or “8647”).
  • The case centers on a May 2025 post that Comey later deleted, after the Secret Service investigated it.
  • Federal prosecutors say the post amounted to a serious threat against President Donald Trump and charged Comey with two felony counts tied to making and sending a threat.
  • Comey’s lawyers argue the “86 47” message is a common protest slogan and political hyperbole, not a statement of violence.
  • The defense says prosecutors cannot show Comey intended to threaten anyone, which they argue is required for the case to stand.
  • Comey argues the case violates the First Amendment because it punishes political speech and could chill others from speaking out.
  • Prosecutors argue that a reasonable person could read the image as a real threat, even if it is presented as a slogan.
  • Comey’s legal team has said it plans to raise claims that the case is selective or vindictive prosecution.
  • The Justice Department’s response to the dismissal request is due by Aug. 18, and the case could go to trial in October.

Why This Matters

  • The case could reshape how far free speech protects heated political messages online.
  • It affects how prosecutors and courts decide when vague slogans cross into punishable threats.
  • Because it involves a former FBI director and a president, the outcome could influence public trust in fair, nonpartisan law enforcement.
  • If ambiguous posts can bring felony charges, more people may self-censor to avoid legal risk.

Who else would want to know this?