ICE to spend up to $20m on gloves that can deliver painful electric shocks
GOVERNMENT SPENDING

ICE to spend up to $20m on gloves that can deliver painful electric shocks

Aug 12, 2026Updated 6:10pm ET

The Department of Homeland Security says ICE plans to spend up to $20 million on “G.L.O.V.E.” electric-shock gloves for some officers, drawing debate over whether the pain-compliance tool is controlled and accountable or likely to be abused.

The Department of Homeland Security says ICE plans to spend up to $20 million on “G.L.O.V.E.” electric-shock gloves for some officers, drawing debate over whether the pain-compliance tool is controlled and accountable or likely to be abused.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
The Washington PostThe GuardianAxiosBCBluewinHuffpost

Confirmed by 11+ sources.

What This is

  • The Department of Homeland Security published a notice for ICE to spend up to $20 million to buy thousands of electric-shock “G.L.O.V.E.” patrol gloves.
  • The gloves are intended for field use by ICE units including Enforcement and Removal Operations and Homeland Security Investigations.
  • The gloves are hand-mounted devices that can deliver a painful electric shock when activated to compel compliance during field encounters.
  • Some reports say the device may record when it is activated, but critics argue it could still be used in ways that are harder to see and track than a taser.
  • Some reports say the purchase could be made through a proposed no-bid contract, raising questions about how the device was chosen.
  • Other civil-rights advocates warn the gloves could make it easier for ICE agents to use excessive force, raising questions about oversight.

Why This Matters

  • It sharpens the moral and legal debate over whether inflicting pain is an acceptable way to make people comply during immigration enforcement.
  • It could shift day-to-day arrests and transports by adding a close-contact force option that may be easier to use quickly than a stun gun.
  • It puts more pressure on ICE to show clear rules, strong training, and real consequences when officers misuse force.
  • It also raises questions about transparency if the government buys the device without open competition and clear public explanations.

Who else would want to know this?