ICE awards $16.7 million contract for electric shock gloves
IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT

ICE awards $16.7 million contract for electric shock gloves

Aug 29, 2026Updated 12:33pm ET

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has awarded a $16.7 million no-bid contract for 6,000 electric-shock “G.L.O.V.E.” gloves, drawing pushback from Democratic lawmakers and rights groups over safety, oversight, and use-of-force concerns.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has awarded a $16.7 million no-bid contract for 6,000 electric-shock “G.L.O.V.E.” gloves, drawing pushback from Democratic lawmakers and rights groups over safety, oversight, and use-of-force concerns.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
The GuardianABCABC 30Salt Lake Cityabc7ABC7 News

Confirmed by 29+ sources.

What This is

  • ICE awarded a $16.7 million no-bid contract to buy 6,000 electric-shock “G.L.O.V.E.” gloves from Compliant Technologies.
  • ICE says the gloves are meant to help control resisting or combative people and may be used during arrests, transport, and disturbances, with use governed by training and policy.
  • Civil-rights and human-rights groups argue the gloves add a hard-to-track way to inflict pain and raise concerns about medical safety, proportionality, and accountability.
  • A group of Democratic senators urged ICE to halt the purchase and asked for details on training, limits, documentation, and oversight.
  • House Democrats also asked DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin to stop the procurement, citing ICE’s past use-of-force problems and the manufacturer’s warning that use may cause injury or death.
  • DHS has defended the purchase as a reviewed equipment decision, and ICE officials say training protocols are being developed.
  • California lawmakers introduced a bill to ban possession, use, or procurement of shock gloves by agencies in the state or with state funds.

Why This Matters

  • The fight tests what level of pain and risk is acceptable when the government uses force in immigration arrests and detention.
  • Because the gloves deliver shocks through direct contact, critics say they could be used in ways that are harder to see and later prove, raising oversight and accountability concerns.
  • The dispute also reflects larger tensions over how ICE modernizes enforcement tools, including robotics, and who sets limits on their use.
  • State and local moves to ban the devices could create clashes between federal enforcement practices and rules set by states, schools, and police departments.

Who else would want to know this?