Gunman killed after opening fire near White House checkpoint; investigation ongoing
NATIONAL SECURITY

Gunman killed after opening fire near White House checkpoint; investigation ongoing

May 24, 2026Updated 9:43am ET

A gunman opened fire at a U.S. Secret Service security checkpoint near the White House and was fatally shot by Secret Service personnel after an exchange of gunfire.

A gunman opened fire at a U.S. Secret Service security checkpoint near the White House and was fatally shot by Secret Service personnel after an exchange of gunfire.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh

Confirmed by 15+ sources.

What This is

  • A gunman opened fire at a U.S. Secret Service security checkpoint near the White House and was fatally shot by Secret Service personnel after an exchange of gunfire.
  • The suspect was transported to a hospital and later pronounced dead, while a bystander was struck and injured during the incident.
  • President Donald Trump was inside the White House at the time and was not injured, and no Secret Service agents were reported injured.
  • The White House complex and nearby area were briefly locked down, with streets blocked and journalists and bystanders moved to shelter as the scene was secured.
  • Law enforcement and media identified the suspect as 21-year-old Nasire Best from Maryland, and officials said the FBI is assisting the Secret Service investigation.
  • Reports say Best had prior encounters with the Secret Service and documented mental-health issues, including prior psychiatric interventions.
  • Court documents and officials cited a prior stay-away order barring Best from the White House area, and some reports noted an outstanding bench warrant.
  • Officials have not announced a motive, while some reports describe social-media posts in which Best made grandiose claims and appeared to threaten Trump or reference the White House.
  • Trump praised the Secret Service response, and some coverage framed the shooting as part of a recent string of security incidents and political violence around Trump.

Why This Matters

  • The incident tests the resilience and response speed of protective security at the seat of U.S. executive power.
  • Repeated security scares near national political leaders can erode public confidence and increase political polarization and fear.
  • The case highlights hard policy tradeoffs in handling people flagged for mental-health crises while protecting public spaces.
  • How investigators explain motive and prior warning signs can shape future rules for threat reporting and interagency coordination.

Who else would want to know this?