Federal land protections scaled back at two Utah national monuments
ENVIRONMENT

Federal land protections scaled back at two Utah national monuments

Jul 14, 2026Updated 7:16am ET

President Donald Trump has ordered major boundary cuts to Utah’s Bears Ears and Grand Staircase–Escalante national monuments, removing protections from millions of acres and reopening debate over development, tribal interests, and whether a president can shrink monuments.

President Donald Trump has ordered major boundary cuts to Utah’s Bears Ears and Grand Staircase–Escalante national monuments, removing protections from millions of acres and reopening debate over development, tribal interests, and whether a president can shrink monuments.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
The New York TimesThe GuardianSalt Lake CityABC News MediaAdnAxios

Confirmed by 25+ sources.

What This is

  • President Donald Trump signed proclamations shrinking Bears Ears and Grand Staircase–Escalante national monuments in southern Utah by about 90% each.
  • The combined protected area fell from more than 3.2 million acres to under about 303,000 acres, with Bears Ears cut to about 121,100 acres and Grand Staircase–Escalante to about 181,500 acres.
  • Trump used the Antiquities Act to make the changes, reviving a dispute over how much power a president has to reduce or redraw national monuments.
  • The move reverses monument boundary restorations made by President Joe Biden after Trump made similar reductions during his first term.
  • Supporters say the smaller monuments allow more local control and expand access for uses like mining, drilling, grazing, logging, and motorized recreation.
  • Critics, including tribal leaders and conservation groups, say the cuts threaten sacred Indigenous sites and archaeological resources and argue tribes were not properly consulted.
  • Legal challenges were announced, with opponents arguing the law that lets presidents create monuments does not clearly allow them to shrink them later.
  • The monuments are known for distinctive geology and fossil finds as well as Native American cultural sites, making land-use decisions there especially contested.

Why This Matters

  • The outcome will shape how easily presidents can undo protected public lands set by earlier administrations.
  • It forces a tradeoff between conserving cultural and scientific sites and expanding extraction and recreation on federal land.
  • For many tribes, the dispute is also about respect for sacred places and whether the federal government consults them before changing land protections.
  • The decision could affect jobs and revenues tied to mining, energy, grazing, and tourism in southern Utah.
  • Court rulings here could guide future conflicts over public lands across the West.

Who else would want to know this?