
ELECTIONS
Federal judge rules FEMA cannot condition emergency funds on states changing election practices
A federal judge blocked FEMA from withholding up to 20% of counterterrorism grant money to push states and local governments to adopt specific election administration and security changes.
A federal judge blocked FEMA from withholding up to 20% of counterterrorism grant money to push states and local governments to adopt specific election administration and security changes.
Corroboration
LowMedHigh
Confirmed by 13+ sources.
What This is
- A federal judge ruled FEMA cannot tie counterterrorism grant funding to states adopting new election-administration requirements.
- The blocked policy would have withheld about 20% of counterterrorism grant awards from jurisdictions that did not comply.
- The judge said the agencies lacked clear authority from Congress to impose these election-related conditions on the grants.
- The ruling also found the election conditions were not closely related to the purpose of the counterterrorism grants.
- The disputed requirements included verifying voter citizenship and setting mandatory audits and other election plans set by the federal government.
- The guidance also pushed some jurisdictions to move from certain electronic systems to hand-marked paper ballots.
Why This Matters
- The decision reinforces that Congress, not agencies, must clearly authorize major new conditions attached to federal funding.
- It shapes how much national influence Washington can exert over election security through grant programs that were created for other purposes.
- It affects local budgeting because cities and states often count on counterterrorism grants for public-safety planning.





