Federal judge extends block on new USPS mail-in ballot restrictions
ELECTIONS

Federal judge extends block on new USPS mail-in ballot restrictions

Sep 5, 2026Updated 7:53am ET

A federal judge has extended a court order blocking new U.S. Postal Service requirements for mail-in ballots tied to a Trump executive order, as the Justice Department seeks to overturn the block while states start sending midterm ballots.

A federal judge has extended a court order blocking new U.S. Postal Service requirements for mail-in ballots tied to a Trump executive order, as the Justice Department seeks to overturn the block while states start sending midterm ballots.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
AdnAl JazeeraThe Boston GlobeBoston HeraldCBS NewsBoulder Daily Camera

Confirmed by 10+ sources.

What This is

  • Federal Judge Indira Talwani issued a preliminary injunction blocking a Trump-directed USPS rule that would change how states handle mail-in ballots.
  • The blocked rule would require states to use a USPS online portal and new ballot designs, including barcode-based tracking steps.
  • The judge said the rule was rushed, likely unlawful, and could lead to voters being disenfranchised in the 2026 midterms.
  • The Justice Department is asking the Supreme Court to lift the block, setting up a possible high-court fight before the election.
  • A whistleblower complaint sent to Sen. Richard Blumenthal says USPS rushed an untested portal and barcode system that could cause mass ballot problems, including whole batches being rejected or misprocessed.
  • The White House and USPS have defended the work to comply with the executive order even as litigation continues.
  • States are already mailing out ballots in some places, and election officials say the shifting rules and court fights are causing confusion for voters.
  • States and voting-rights groups argue the USPS rule would override state control of election administration.

Why This Matters

  • Mail voting depends on clear, stable rules, and late changes can make voters miss deadlines or make mistakes.
  • The dispute tests how much power the federal government and USPS can claim over election procedures that states usually run.
  • Court timing matters: rulings close to Election Day can leave officials scrambling and raise doubts about fairness even if systems work.
  • If the Supreme Court steps in, it could set a national precedent on how far administrative agencies can reshape voting access.

Who else would want to know this?