Federal judge blocks policy allowing arrests at immigration courts nationwide
IMMIGRATION

Federal judge blocks policy allowing arrests at immigration courts nationwide

Jun 23, 2026Updated 10:11pm ET

A federal judge in California blocked a nationwide policy that allowed Immigration and Customs Enforcement to arrest people at or near immigration courts.

A federal judge in California blocked a nationwide policy that allowed Immigration and Customs Enforcement to arrest people at or near immigration courts.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
The New York TimesCNNABC 17 NewsKRDOKTVZNG

Confirmed by 7+ sources.

What This is

  • A federal judge in California blocked a nationwide policy that allowed Immigration and Customs Enforcement to arrest people at or near immigration courts.
  • The judge issued a nationwide injunction temporarily stopping immigration-court arrests while the case proceeds.
  • The ruling said the policy could discourage noncitizens from attending required immigration court hearings, creating a chilling effect.
  • The judge found the policy change was unlawful because it was arbitrary and capricious, meaning the government did not adequately justify the reversal of prior limits on courthouse enforcement.
  • Lawyers’ groups praised the decision as protecting access to immigration courts, while Department of Homeland Security officials criticized it as judicial overreach that restricts enforcement.

Why This Matters

  • The decision shapes whether immigration courts function as safe forums for due process or as enforcement zones that deter participation.
  • It affects the integrity and efficiency of the court system, because missed hearings can increase backlogs and lead to decisions without the person present.
  • It tests the limits of executive power to change enforcement practices without a clear, reasoned explanation and invites wider judicial oversight.
  • A nationwide injunction sets a single rule for immigration courts across the country, concentrating the impact of one case on national policy.

Who else would want to know this?