Federal court maintains Pentagon's blacklisting of Anthropic from military contracts
DEFENSE

Federal court maintains Pentagon's blacklisting of Anthropic from military contracts

Sep 25, 2026Updated 6:35pm ET

A U.S. appeals court upheld the Pentagon’s decision to label AI company Anthropic a national-security “supply-chain risk,” keeping it barred from Defense Department contracts amid a dispute over whether the military could use Anthropic’s Claude model without the company’s safety limits.

A U.S. appeals court upheld the Pentagon’s decision to label AI company Anthropic a national-security “supply-chain risk,” keeping it barred from Defense Department contracts amid a dispute over whether the military could use Anthropic’s Claude model without the company’s safety limits.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
The New York TimesReutersThe Washington PostABC News MediaAl JazeeraBusiness Insider

Confirmed by 11+ sources.

What This is

  • A U.S. appeals court declined to block the Pentagon’s blacklisting of Anthropic from Defense Department contracts.
  • The appeals court upheld the blacklist in a 2-1 decision and rejected Anthropic’s claims that the ban was arbitrary and unconstitutional.
  • The Pentagon designated Anthropic as a national-security supply-chain risk, which keeps it off Defense Department contracts.
  • The Pentagon sought “all lawful uses” or broad freedom to use Claude, while Anthropic said its guardrails would bar uses like fully autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance.
  • Anthropic has said it would not remove safety safeguards from Claude, and the Pentagon cited that stance in its decision.
  • Anthropic says the designation has cost it billions and harmed its IPO prospects, and it is considering further court review.

Why This Matters

  • The case affects who sets the rules for military AI: the government buying it, or the company building it.
  • It highlights the tension between AI safety limits and the military’s desire for wide freedom to use tools on sensitive missions.
  • It signals courts may give the Pentagon broad room to act when it cites national security, even when the decision hits business prospects and raises constitutional claims.

Who else would want to know this?