FBI seizes Swalwell’s devices as sexual misconduct investigation escalates
JUSTICE PUBLIC SAFETY

FBI seizes Swalwell’s devices as sexual misconduct investigation escalates

Aug 21, 2026Updated 6:27am ET

The FBI seized former Rep. Eric Swalwell’s electronic devices and searched his Washington, D.C., home under warrants as part of a Justice Department criminal investigation into sexual assault and other sexual misconduct allegations.

The FBI seized former Rep. Eric Swalwell’s electronic devices and searched his Washington, D.C., home under warrants as part of a Justice Department criminal investigation into sexual assault and other sexual misconduct allegations.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
The GuardianCNNABC News MediaAl JazeeraBCCBS News

Confirmed by 19+ sources.

What This is

  • FBI agents served search warrants on former Rep. Eric Swalwell at San Francisco International Airport and seized electronic devices, including at least one cellphone.
  • Agents also executed a search warrant at Swalwell’s Washington, D.C., home and seized electronics there.
  • The searches are tied to an ongoing Justice Department criminal probe into sexual misconduct, including sexual assault allegations, according to the reports.
  • The FBI and the Justice Department have not publicly explained the warrants, and both declined to comment in several reports.
  • Swalwell was not arrested or detained during the airport search, according to one report.
  • Multiple accusations preceded the FBI actions and contributed to Swalwell resigning from Congress in April and ending his run for California governor.
  • Swalwell has denied wrongdoing, including denying an assault allegation while acknowledging mistakes in judgment, according to one report.
  • Other law enforcement agencies have also opened investigations, including the Manhattan district attorney’s office and the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, according to reports.

Why This Matters

  • Search warrants and device seizures suggest investigators believe key evidence could be in private communications and stored files.
  • The case raises questions about whether political power affects how quickly and aggressively alleged sex crimes are investigated.
  • Separate investigations by different offices can complicate timing, cooperation, and what charges can be pursued.
  • High-profile allegations can shape public trust in how authorities handle consent disputes and credibility claims.

Who else would want to know this?