
POLITICS
California leaders rebuke Trump over remarks about Iran striking Los Angeles and San Diego
President Donald Trump drew backlash after telling a Nebraska rally that Iran could “take out” Los Angeles and San Diego and calling that outcome “a very small price to pay,” as California officials condemned the remarks and the White House said he was misunderstood.
President Donald Trump drew backlash after telling a Nebraska rally that Iran could “take out” Los Angeles and San Diego and calling that outcome “a very small price to pay,” as California officials condemned the remarks and the White House said he was misunderstood.
Corroboration
LowMedHigh
Confirmed by 45+ sources.
What This is
- At an Oct. 5 campaign rally in Nebraska, President Donald Trump said Iran could “take out” Los Angeles and San Diego and described it as “a very small price to pay.”
- Trump made the remarks while arguing that higher gas prices tied to the Iran war were a small price to pay for keeping the United States safe.
- California officials, including Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria, condemned the comments as reckless and dangerous.
- Gov. Newsom directed California’s State Threat Assessment Center to monitor for possible threats following the remarks.
- Newsom and several other officials urged considering the 25th Amendment, which allows a president to be removed if deemed unable to perform the duties of the office.
- National security experts noted there is no clear intelligence that Iran can strike California as Trump described, citing limits on Iran's long-range missile reach and its lack of known nuclear weapons.
- The remarks drew bipartisan criticism, including from a Republican candidate in San Diego who called the comments unacceptable.
Why This Matters
- Presidential rhetoric about accepting attacks can influence how Americans judge a leader’s basic duty to protect the public.
- The dispute illustrates how unclear or improvised comments can create real fear and confusion about national security.
- The rhetoric could shift public backing for the Iran conflict by tying wartime goals to everyday costs like gas prices.
- The fallout deepens the political clash between the White House and California leaders, potentially shaping midterm messaging in competitive races.





