Bill Gates testifies about ties to Jeffrey Epstein
EPSTEIN FILES

Bill Gates testifies about ties to Jeffrey Epstein

Jun 10, 2026Updated 6:54pm ET

Bill Gates gave voluntary, closed-door, transcribed testimony to the House Oversight Committee about his contacts with Jeffrey Epstein after newly released Justice Department files highlighted their interactions.

Bill Gates gave voluntary, closed-door, transcribed testimony to the House Oversight Committee about his contacts with Jeffrey Epstein after newly released Justice Department files highlighted their interactions.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
The New York TimesApnewsThe BBCWSJNPRThe Guardian

Confirmed by 65+ sources.

What This is

  • Bill Gates gave voluntary, closed-door, transcribed testimony to the House Oversight Committee about his contacts with Jeffrey Epstein after newly released Justice Department files highlighted their interactions.
  • Gates said meeting Epstein was a “grave error in judgment,” and he apologized for the association, including saying he is sorry if it lent Epstein credibility.
  • Gates said his meetings with Epstein occurred mainly from 2011 to 2014 and were driven by discussions about philanthropy and possible fundraising for global health work that did not produce donations.
  • Gates denied involvement in Epstein’s crimes and said he never witnessed any criminal conduct by Epstein.
  • Gates told lawmakers Epstein tried to use knowledge of Gates’s extramarital affairs as leverage or blackmail to pressure him to stay engaged.
  • Gates said he never visited Epstein’s home or private island and described avoiding a personal friendship with Epstein.
  • House Oversight Chair James Comer said the committee is probing Epstein’s connections to powerful figures and also scrutinizing the Justice Department’s handling and release of Epstein-related files, including seeking more interviews.
  • Gates and the Gates Foundation have launched or commissioned an external review of past contacts with Epstein amid renewed scrutiny.

Why This Matters

  • The testimony tests how Congress uses oversight power when criminal charges are not alleged but reputational and influence questions remain.
  • It probes whether philanthropic and business networks can unintentionally give social legitimacy to people with known criminal histories.
  • The dispute over what the Justice Department released, redacted, or delayed affects public trust in equal accountability for elites.
  • Claims of leverage or blackmail show how private misconduct can create pressure points that distort decision-making by powerful leaders.

Who else would want to know this?