Biden sues to block release of audio and transcripts in special counsel probe
GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY

Biden sues to block release of audio and transcripts in special counsel probe

May 27, 2026Updated 12:06pm ET

Former President Joe Biden sued the Department of Justice to stop the release of audio recordings and transcripts from 2016–2017 interviews he gave to his memoir ghostwriter/biographer that were used in the Robert Hur special counsel probe.

Former President Joe Biden sued the Department of Justice to stop the release of audio recordings and transcripts from 2016–2017 interviews he gave to his memoir ghostwriter/biographer that were used in the Robert Hur special counsel probe.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
NPRABC News MediaAxiosThe Boston GlobeCBS NewsClickOnDetroit

Confirmed by 17+ sources.

What This is

  • Former President Joe Biden sued the Department of Justice to stop the release of audio recordings and transcripts from 2016–2017 interviews he gave to his memoir ghostwriter/biographer that were used in the Robert Hur special counsel probe.
  • Biden argues the recordings and transcripts are private materials and that disclosure would unlawfully invade his privacy.
  • The lawsuit argues the Justice Department should protect information gathered in criminal investigations and that the materials have been treated as exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, which governs public-records requests.
  • The Justice Department has said it plans to provide redacted versions of the materials after Freedom of Information Act litigation, including to Congress and the Heritage Foundation, with a release date reported as June 15.
  • The recordings and transcripts were obtained by Special Counsel Robert Hur during his investigation of Biden’s handling of classified documents, and Hur ultimately recommended no criminal charges.
  • Some coverage highlights that the Hur report discussed Biden’s memory and cognitive presentation in assessing whether prosecutors could prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • Biden’s suit also raises executive privilege claims, which assert that some presidential communications should be kept confidential to protect executive decision-making.

Why This Matters

  • The case tests how much the public and Congress can learn about evidence gathered in politically sensitive investigations once prosecutors decline charges.
  • It affects transparency norms for how administrations handle Freedom of Information Act disputes involving investigative files, redactions, and court-ordered disclosures.
  • The outcome could reshape expectations for privacy and executive confidentiality when presidents or ex-presidents are interviewed as part of criminal inquiries.
  • It also influences public trust by setting precedents on whether politically consequential audio evidence is released or withheld.

Who else would want to know this?