Appeals court denies DOJ request to block California mail in ballots
ELECTION INTEGRITY

Appeals court denies DOJ request to block California mail in ballots

Oct 28, 2026Updated 8:01am ET

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied the Justice Department’s emergency bid to make California set aside about 20,000 mail ballots linked to voters the DOJ alleges may be noncitizens, leaving the dispute to continue in district court.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied the Justice Department’s emergency bid to make California set aside about 20,000 mail ballots linked to voters the DOJ alleges may be noncitizens, leaving the dispute to continue in district court.

Corroboration

LowMedHigh
ApnewsThe GuardianCNNABC 15abc7ABC News Media

Confirmed by 33+ sources.

What This is

  • The Justice Department sought an emergency order to make California set aside or stop counting about 20,000 mail ballots tied to voters it says are likely noncitizens.
  • A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit denied the DOJ request, saying it was too soon to intervene before the district court had fully considered the case.
  • The appeals court said it lacked jurisdiction to grant the emergency relief at that stage of the case.
  • Judges pressed the DOJ on whether it had legal authority and whether the appeals court even had jurisdiction to act at that stage of the case.
  • Some judges also questioned the timing, noting the DOJ sought emergency relief close to the election after delays in pursuing the dispute.
  • California officials argued the federal list is unreliable and that separating or pausing ballots could wrongly block eligible voters from having their votes counted.
  • Federal prosecutors also sent letters to at least 18 California counties demanding they identify, set aside, and verify ballots tied to people on the federal list within 48 hours.
  • A federal district judge in Los Angeles heard the DOJ request and signaled he was unlikely to order immediate relief while setting further hearings and a near-term ruling.
  • The California fight is part of a broader DOJ push to play a larger role in how states handle suspected noncitizen registration and voting, including similar demands made to Washington state election officials.

Why This Matters

  • It shapes how far the federal government can go in directing how states run elections.
  • It affects public trust because claims about noncitizen voting can spread doubt even when evidence is disputed.
  • It tests how courts balance stopping ineligible voting against the risk of wrongly throwing out eligible voters’ ballots.
  • It highlights how late legal actions and short deadlines can strain election offices and increase the chance of mistakes.

Who else would want to know this?